Extension of number concepts to integers

In the paper Using intuition from everyday life in ‘filling’ the gap in children’s extension of their concept to include negative numbers, the authors reports an instructional method designed to address the cognitive gaps in children’s mathematical development where operational conceptions give rise to structural conceptions (such as when the subtraction process leads to the negative number concept). The method involves the linking of process and object conceptions through semiotic activity with models which first record processes in situations outside mathematics and subsequently mediate activity with the signs of mathematics.



The authors describe two experiments in teaching integers, an interesting case in which previous literature has focused on the dichotomy between the algebraic approach and the modelling approach to instruction and conceptualize modelling as the transformation of outside-school knowledge into school mathematics, and discuss the opportunities and difficulties involved. Their instructional method build on Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) developed by Freudenthal’s followers at the Freudenthal Institute (Treffers, 1987; Gravemeijer, 1994).

The study involved a series of teaching sequences, each of about 5 one hour- long sessions, with groups (of three children at a time in the first experiment and four in the second experiment) of grade 6 pupils who had not yet received any instruction in negative numbers. The final sequence led the children to construct the integers and operations of addition and subtraction.

Authors: LIORA LINCHEVSKI and JULIAN WILLIAMS

Educational Studies in Mathematics 39: 131–147, 1999. © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Intuitive nonexamples: the case of triangles

In this paper the authors examine the possibility of differentiating between two types of
nonexamples. The first type, intuitive nonexamples, consists of nonexamples which are
intuitively accepted as such. That is, children immediately identify them as nonexamples.
The second type, non-intuitive nonexamples, consists of nonexamples that bear a significant similarity to valid examples of the concept, and consequently are more often mistakenly identified as examples. They describe and discuss these notions and present a study regarding kindergarten children’s grasp of nonexamples of triangles.


Although different theories exist regarding the formation of geometrical concepts, in this study they use the van Hiele model as basic framework. Van Hiele theorized that students’ geometrical thinking progresses through a hierarchy of five levels, eventually leading up to formal deductive reasoning. The focus of the study is on the beginning of this development.

According to the van Hiele theory, at the most basic level, students use visual reasoning, taking in the whole shape without considering that the shape is made up of separate components. Students at this level can name shapes and distinguish between similar looking shapes. At the second level students begin to notice that different shapes have different attributes but the attributes are not perceived as being related. At the third level, relationships between attributes are perceived. At this level, definitions are meaningful but proofs are as yet not understood.

Authors: Pessia Tsamir & Dina Tirosh & Esther Levenson

Published online: 25 June 2008
# Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Books by the Authors

  1. The Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 2 (International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education)
  2. Preschool Geometry: Theory, Research, and Practical Perspectives
  3. Implicit & Explicit Knowledge: An Educational Approach (Human Development)
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...